Friday, June 30, 2017

Money For Nothing and Your Chicks For Free: The Update




It wasn't but a week ago that I asked the question, is the bubble about to burst? And just yesterday, the news breaks that Sony will be opening their own vinyl pressing plant and begin pressing their own catalog.

That's right folks, the same company that helped popularized and mobilized cassette tapes with their Walkman and co-developed the CD format which arguably contributed to the steep decline in vinyl sales in the 90s is now wanting to press the very format it tried to make extinct just because it is profitable.

I said it a week ago regarding vinyl outselling digital formats;

"Corporations take note of this type of information. And, doing what corporations do, they figure out how to make a metric shit-ton of cash from it. As a result, we get a bigger market to pick from which is typically good for us consumers."

But, being the critical thinker I am, I also asked the questions:

"If everyone, meaning the millions of fish in the ocean, is manufacturing vinyl, how long will it be before the manufacturing behemoth produces more than the consumer can pay for? How long before the first manufacturer shutters it's doors? How long before our local record stores have more vinyl on their shelves than they can sell. How long will the consumer interest in vinyl support this micro-economy? Does it all come crashing down when our next recession hits?"

What is not known is Sony's entire business plan around vinyl. We know they are going to pressing vinyl, but what we don't know is if they will be pressing only new music released or if they will be pressing their back catalog as well.

If Sony focuses on releasing new music and music from artists that came into popularity after CD and digital formats became a super power, artists like, Katy Perry, Hillary Duff, Chevelle and others, they might do fine as the vinyl market is not flooded with the likes of Katy Perry.

But, if Sony begins reissuing their back catalog of artists that were popular, and mass produced on vinyl in the pre-1990 era, from artists, like Jimi Hendrix, Bob Dylan, David Bowie, Judas Priest, Paul McCartney and Santana as a few examples, they could end up destroying their business plan before it gets off the ground.

This is because new vinyl retails for between $15 and $35 (for the limited colored vinyl releases, I have seen some new vinyl as high as $80) these days. But many of the artists with extensive catalogs that were mass produced before 1990 are already saturated and available at a low cost in the vinyl market. Quality original pressings or reissues can be had for as low as $2 an album and as high as $20. Averaging, based on what paid for my collection of 800+ albums, I paid around $2.41 per album. In come cases, I paid as much as $60 (Metallica's Hardwired box set), but in a lot of cases I paid ZERO.

I got my original pressing of Bob Dylan's Highway 61 Revisited for free, so why would I pay even $20 for it? Because it's a new? Because it's limited? Because it's RED? While I am sure there are consumers in the market that fall for that limited, colored or new is better, I am not one of them.

What the future holds in not clear. I don't know if this announcement by Sony is the needle that will eventually burst the vinyl bubble or not, as only time will tell. But I am sure of one thing; new vinyl costs consumers a lot more money than older pressings that are currently flooding the market and consumers are unpredictable and strange in their shopping habits.

Now I need to go spin my Highway 61 Revisited.



Friday, June 23, 2017

Money For Nothing and Your Chicks For Free: Is The Vinyl Bubble About To Burst?

Here's the thing, a figurative dog is taking a huge, albeit figurative dump in the middle of the room. I don't have the tools to clean up the mess. I am just here to point out the fact that there is poo on the floor.

How's about a little context by drawing on some parallels from different industries. When I re-entered the comic book collecting scene in 2010, I was truly aghast at how complicated and expensive the hobby had become.

I am a die hard Incredible Hulk fan, but to follow the modern Incredible Hulk story, you had to buy seven different comics from seven different superheros; Hulk, Captain America, Iron Man, Black Widow, etc., etc. Some of the crossover books were just Easter eggs, but many others were essential to understanding key events in the story of a character. At $4 - $6 a book... it was way too expensive and way to confusing to stay engaged.

This is nothing more than a strategy by the comic book industry to sell more comic books, action figures and other merchandise.

I wrote a post a back in 2014 for another blog I used to write for called Honest Comics Review. The title of the post was, "The Burst of the Dot-Comic Bubble Approaches; An Essay". The main premise of the post was that Hollywood was doing what Hollywood does; it over-saturates the market of a genre to the point of collapsing the market.

I predicted in that essay that at some point in the near future, the consumer would become weary of the genre that was producing 14+ comic based movies a year and 18 comic based television shows, all of which had comic book tie-ins that would tell the story between the movies and television seasons. And my prediction is starting to come true. In the last year, a few comic book based movies have flopped, a few comic book television series have been cancelled and my local comic shop is starting to see hard times again.

It's a cycle and it's common.

Movies see this trend a lot, especially horror movies. While 1974 introduced us to slashers with Texas Chainsaw Massacre, it was in 1978, Halloween was released that kicked off a popularity of the genre of slasher films to the point that a movie was made to make fun of of the genre; one of the first parody films, Unmasked Part 25.

By the mid to late 80s, with the movie market saturated with slasher films like Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, etc., etc., many of which, mostly the low budget films went straight to VHS, the public was burned out on slasher trope, and money wasn't being made. When money isn't being made, big budget horror movies aren't being made outside of the numerous sequels of well known, established villains; Michael, Freddy and Jason.

Then came 1996 and Wes Craven brought us Scream. Breaking the slasher mold, making fun of the common tropes of the slasher genre while entertaining us with a new villain; Ghost Face. It was very meta, a movie within the genre, using the genre's tired tropes to expose and make fun of the genre's tired tropes.

Slasher Films were cool again and the bubble began to expand.

It is common for these bubbles to expand and then collapse. People get excited for a short period of time, then get bored with the same thing over and over. In the horror movie world, the current bubble is supernatural horror; Annabelle, The Conjuring, Paranormal Activity, Sinister, etc.

In the world of comics, I watched the market explode for something called variant covers for comics. One comic book issue could be released with twelve or more different covers, at different price points. 1 in 50, 1 in 500, 1 in 5000 and even 1 in 50,000 rare unique covers that would sell for $10 to $80 per book; sometimes, even more. Another way for corporations to make money.

Comic book related television shows are being cancelled after just a few seasons, long running comic book series are even being cancelled. Comic Book movies are starting to get stalled in pre-production.

Just like what happened in Slasher Bubble, people are burning out on the comic book genre. I hate to say "I told you so", but I will say...

...I saw it coming.

Now this is not a post about comic books, men in capes or scantily clad women in refrigerators; yes that is a thing in the world of comics. No, this is not a post about horror movies. But there are parallels that can be drawn between these industries and vinyl records.

Let me explain a bit before you burn me as a heretic.

As consumers, we like to spend our money on items we have passion about. In some cases it's music, or audio equipment in other cases it is comic books or horror movies. We all have different reasons for our passions. No matter how similar or dissimilar those reasons may be, in the end, our common passions unite to create this thing called demand.

In 2016 Vinyl Record Sales out performed MP3 downloads for the first time since iTunes began reporting sales. Regardless of our individual reasons for loving vinyl; this is demand.

Corporations take note of this type of information. And, doing what corporations do, they figure out how to make a metric shit-ton of cash from it. As a result, we get a bigger market to pick from which is typically good for us consumers.

Record Store Day is a great example of this expanding market or as I like to call it, exploitation of consumer passions.

While the event was started at a single record store in 2007, the event was launched nationally in 2008 as an annual event, held on a Saturday every April to "celebrate the culture of the independently owned record store". That was the core motivation behind Record Store Day; "celebrate the culture of the independently owned record store."

The first year there were ten special releases that were a part of Record Store Day. It was small grassroots celebration in the truest form of word celebration.

Due to the event's unusually high success and sales, the next year, there were eighty-five "special" releases. Corporations saw an opportunity to exploit the money and they took it. And now, this year, 2017, there were 286 "special" and limited releases. In many cases, this isn't even new music, just limited edition reissues. The same music in a different package. If it sounds a lot like the variant covers for comics books, that because it is exactly the same thing.

Record Store Day has become so exploited, that the day before Record Store Day 2017 happened some of those special releases, like Jason Isabelle's limited release, retail priced at $18, were already listed on Ebay for $100 or more; again, the day before.

What started as an grassroots event to celebrate the very people that kept the music from slipping into the background of our lives, in less than a decade, Record Store Day became a juggernaut of retail exploitation, in many cases making the a year's worth of sales for local record stores in a single day. But this is not the record store's fault. It is all on the industry.

Limited Edition Pressings
Different Colored Pressings
Re-Releases
Two Record Store Days per year (yes... they released limited edition vinyl and cds on Black Friday as a part of a second Record Store Day)

I am not here to throw Record Store Day under the bus. The over commercialization of Record Store Day is only part of the problem and the source of this problem is the mega corporations.

Back in the 70s and 80s, we had BMG and Columbia House as the alternative methods for acquiring music, known as record clubs. I f you wanted vinyl cheap back then, you played the record club game. Anyone remember 11 records for a penny?

Today, everyone under the sun is getting into the vinyl manufacturing business, specializing in "rare", "limited edition" pressings of known and obscure bands. We have Numero Group, Third Man Store, Mississippi Records’, Vinyl Me, Please, Wax & Stamp, Now-Again Deluxe, Flying Vinyl... and so many more. And yes, even  Columbia House announced, in February 2016, it was getting back into the Record Club Business "by the end of 2016" (although they missed their deadline for their "New Details Coming Soon" as no new details have been provided since that announcement.) It sounds, by the cast silence coming from Columbia House, like Columbia House may have reconsidered the record club business.

Many of these record services don't even operate like in the traditional sense that clubs of the past did. Instead, these clubs took a cue from the Loot Crates of the world. In today's service, you mostly pay absurd amounts of money, anywhere from $20 a month to $300 a quarter, and you receive a "surprise" at your doorstep. That's right, you don't get to select your record(s).

It's a lot like Loot Crate for vinyl, you're promised something cool every month, but in the end it's a surprise. The problem with this business model is, my definition of "cool" is different than your definition of "cool" and we are both different from "his" definition of "cool" and "his" is different from her definition of "cool". Not everyone likes the same thing; that is what makes digging for vinyl so rewarding; it's a personal experience.

I know lot of people who subscribed to Loot Crate (and other similar services) that are just similar to these modern "record clubs". In the case of Loot Crate, without fail, these people start by being excited about everything they get in their surprise box, then after a few months, they start disliking a few of the things they get. A few months after that, they aren't happy with most of what they get. If you don't believe me, try watching a few un-boxing videos for Loot Crate or Horror Box on youtube. They are excited about one or two things in the box, if that sometimes, but the rest, they openly say they are going to throw it on ebay or donate it to their local Goodwill.

When it comes to these record clubs, I don't know about you, but if I am paying crazy amounts of money, I better be getting music I want and not some German Techno Folk Metal. Don't get me wrong, it's not that I don't need some German Techno Folk Metal in my life, I just don't need it month after month after month after month.

Hell, I have small collection by many standards, but still, at over 800 records in my collection. When I play the "have it/need it" game, when I am digging, I find myself saying "Have it" more than I say "Need it". If I was paying a service to get vinyl every month, like Vinyl Me, Please who sends out older records, like Black Sabbath, Talking Heads, Etc. and they were sending me duplicates of records I already owned every month, I would not find a lot of value in that real fast.

Finally it seems that everybody under the sun is making vinyl records. Recently it was announced that Jack White just started Third Man Pressing, a record pressing company that is going to specialize in limited edition, colored vinyl pressings. Yet another fish in the ocean of specialized record pressing companies. As to not just throw shade at Jack, I am happy that his fifty employees will be making $15 an hour and have a nice benefits package; something that is rare in Detroit.

But, in the end, Jack White's Third Man Pressing is just another example of adding to the continuing over-saturation of the manufacturing market. But Jack isn't the only problem it's the industry as a whole.

The questions that beg to be answered are;

  1. How long can all of these manufacturers stay in business? 
  2. How long will the world's mass-re-acquired love of vinyl remain? 
  3. How much disposable income does the world have to spend on vinyl?
  4. What happens when the vinyl bubble finally pops?

If everyone, meaning the millions of fish in the ocean, is manufacturing vinyl, how long will it be before the manufacturing behemoth produces more than the consumer can pay for? How long before the first manufacturer shutters it's doors? How long before our local record stores have more vinyl on their shelves than they can sell. How long will the consumer interest in vinyl support this micro-economy? Does it all come crashing down when our next recession hits?

I don't know the answer to these questions, I'm just a consumer; a person pointing at the poo in the room. A poo pointer. What I do know is that while it lasts we should enjoy it. And when the vinyl bubble does burst, because it will, when it all comes crashing down, those of us who are real music lovers, will find all the German Techno Folk Metal we could ever want in just about every garage sale and Goodwill we go to.

Monday, June 5, 2017

Is It Nostalgia Or Something Else?


I just read an article that explained the sole reason for the new found love and resurgence of vinyl is nostalgia. You know what?

The article kind of pissed me off.

Nostalgia is defined as:

"A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations."

Why is it that we have to make generalized statements about a group of people and then classify them in mostly disparaging ways? Saying someone is nostalgic, in the context of the article I read, is a passive aggressive way saying these people are living in the past, afraid of the future. It's like high school all over again. The Jocks, the Nerds, Band Geeks, etc.

If somebody loves vinyl, that should be enough. If it's not, then the fact that that love music should be enough.

I, like so many others have many different reasons for my love of vinyl. I get it a lot from acquaintances, "Ah you grew up in the 70s", meaning I am old, "so you long for old stuff again."

That simply isn't true.

Being as I grew up in the 70s I should, by that logic, enjoy John Carpenter's Halloween more than Rob Zombie's Halloween. That would be a false assumption. I actually enjoy the gritty new style and storytelling in today's horror overall. It doesn't mean I dislike the original either. I have a a deep appreciation of both, for different reasons.

While I love vinyl, I also enjoy the portability of digital music. I can't take my entire record collection with me to play on a road trip, but I can slip a 32GB SD card into my car's console and have enough music to run my gas tank dry 30 times over before hearing a repeated song.

But if I could listen to vinyl in the car, I would.

Being that I was born during the Summer of Love, that would be the Summer of '69, yes just like the Bryan Adams' song of the same name, I came of age in the 70s and 80s. But, my childhood wasn't remotely like That 70's Show, Dazed and Confused, The Wonder Years or even Almost Famous portrayed. I was raised by a strict single mother until I was six, when she then married an abusive, womanizing, alcoholic, blue-collar, mill worker, things went downhill from there.

I was a particularly precocious child with a natural curiosity for how things work and a wild imagination. That combination kept me in a lot of trouble throughout my childhood. As a result I spent a lot of time being punished by various means; of which, one punishment was being grounded, alone, to my room, for weeks at a time.

So to prevent this from being a recap of my crappy childhood, because that is not my intent, it's just easier for me to say, the "good ole days" aren't all that worthy of remembering them in fondness; no nostalgia is in my heart for that time in my life.

I have many friends who definitely collect things in the name of nostalgia; an attempt to hold on to their fond memories of the past. They do this openly, admitting that it's nostalgia. While I can understand why these friends do this, I don't really relate to it, but at the same time I also don't judge them as I can find a connection with them: We love some of the same things. Reason's aren't important.

If I am going to be honest here, I have to disclose that I didn't knowingly hear a Led Zeppelin song until I was nineteen years old. My first known memory of a Queen song, wasn't even Queen, but rather Weird Al's parody of Queen with "Another One Rides the Bus."

My own exposure to music was fairly narrow and it didn't broaden until I was into my late teens, early twenties. And this helps answer the question: So why vinyl?

When I started broadening my musical world, CDs were the "new" thing on the market. CD Players were expensive as was the CDs themselves. As a result, between 1987 and 1993, I could buy two, sometimes three, vinyl albums for the price of one CD. I could check out vinyl albums from the public library. I was able to explore so much more music for my limited (military) income.

But for me there are a few things about vinyl I learned to love from an early age and developed into my late teens and early twenties.

I love the tangibility of vinyl. I love the fact that I can touch it, hold it, smell it, see it, in its entirety, in detail; the liner notes, the cover art, the gate fold art, the inner sleeve art, the lyrics; it is a complete experience. There isn't a screen sitting between me and the experience of music; filtering it. Even CDs and Cassettes cannot replicate that experience like vinyl can.

I love the ritual of vinyl. Walking my fingers through a bin of vinyl to find that one gem I can add to my collection. Sliding the album out of its sleeve, gently laying it on the platter and dropping the needle (yes, I still call it a needle and always will).

I love the raw and stable nature of vinyl. With the proper care and handling, vinyl sounds the same today as it did when it was pressed. And the care and handling aren't all that complicated.

I love the discovery of new-to-me music that vinyl makes affordable. Because vinyl is still pretty inexpensive, I can discover new music at a rate that is unprecedented even in CDs.

I love the game I play as I flip through a bin of records; The game of "have it | need it | leave it".

I love that when I buy vinyl, I truly own it and I'm not just licensing it. I can play it, record it, play it back when and where I want. I can loan it out to friend. I can trade it, sell it, gift it. It is personal.

I love the mystery of vinyl hunting. Going to a garage sale or even my local record store and see what they got in their "Recently Arrived Used Section". Each dig through a new bin is new experience with new treasures to be found; new music to fall in love with.

I love that vinyl allows me to determine my favorite songs from an album. Vinyl allows me to discover what I like instead of being told via industry driven algorithms designed to push specific artists and songs to top of a searches or streaming playlists telling me what I should like.

My love of vinyl is not based in some "everything old is new again" movement.

My love of vinyl is not a nostalgia based desire to hold on to some part of the past.

My love of vinyl is not based on a monetary based profit motive.

My love of vinyl is my own, based on who I am.

Even though others may share some of my reasons for a love of vinyl, my love of vinyl is likely different than his love of vinyl and different than her love of vinyl. But the fact remains, we all love music.

Isn't that enough?

Do the formats, the motivations, the classifications of said motivations really matter? Is it really that important to break down, classify and divide something we find commonality in? Why can't we just find that one area of commonality and connect on the fact that we connect there. Embrace each other on the common love.

My love is music. My choice of medium is vinyl. The reason's don't really need to be classified. Can't we drop the labels and drop a needle instead.

Listen.

Connect.

Embrace.

Thrive.

Music.